Acerca de

Roundup Lawsuits

Bayer, the producers of Roundup, have reached a settlement agreement to compensate victims with a total payout of $10 billion

Have you or someone you care about been diagnosed with blood cancer while using Roundup pesticide products? Time is running out to file a claim. Take action now to ensure you don't miss out on potential compensation. You could be eligible to participate in a lawsuit.

Introduction

our mission is to assist individuals in recovering compensation for cases involving non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma caused by pesticides such as Roundup. We have established partnerships with reputable lawyers and law firms specializing in these cases. These legal professionals are selected based on their extensive experience, proven track record, and dedication to advocating for the rights of those affected by this issue.

Through our collaborative efforts, and our partner attorneys are prepared to support you throughout the legal process. We will ensure that your voice is heard and work diligently to help you obtain the compensation you rightfully deserve. We recognize the challenges and hardships you have faced, and we are committed to providing unwavering support every step of the way.

Who Qualifies to Pursue a Roundup Cancer Lawsuit?

Individuals who have been exposed to Roundup and subsequently experienced health complications, particularly cancer, may have grounds to file a Roundup lawsuit. The criteria for eligibility typically encompass the following factors:

Roundup Exposure: The individual must have a documented history of exposure to Roundup or its active ingredient, glyphosate. Exposure can occur through various channels, including occupational exposure for farmers, landscapers, or gardeners, as well as residential use for personal gardening purposes.
Diagnosis of Health Complications: A medical diagnosis linking specific health conditions to Roundup exposure is essential. While non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is commonly associated with Roundup use, other forms of cancer and health issues may also be considered.
Timeframe of Exposure: There is usually a defined timeframe during which the exposure to Roundup must have taken place. This timeframe may vary based on the laws and regulations governing the jurisdiction where the lawsuit is filed.
Statute of Limitations: It's crucial to adhere to the statute of limitations for filing a Roundup lawsuit. This legal timeframe dictates the period within which a lawsuit must be initiated following the discovery of an injury or illness. The statute of limitations varies depending on the jurisdiction and circumstances of the case, necessitating consultation with a lawyer to determine the applicable timeframe.

Potential claimants should seek guidance from an experienced attorney specializing in product liability or personal injury cases related to Roundup. An attorney can assess the individual's situation, gather pertinent evidence, and provide assistance throughout the legal process of pursuing a Roundup lawsuit.

Background Info

The Roundup litigation centers on the herbicide Roundup, which features glyphosate as its active component. Glyphosate, a widely used herbicide, has sparked concerns regarding potential health hazards, particularly its alleged link to cancer. This legal dispute has attracted considerable attention due to its ramifications for public health, agriculture, and regulatory frameworks.

Roundup, originally manufactured by Monsanto (now under Bayer AG's ownership), has been utilized by farmers, gardeners, and landscapers globally since the 1970s. However, conflicting research findings on glyphosate's safety have contributed to ongoing controversy. Some studies indicate a possible correlation between glyphosate exposure and an elevated risk of certain cancers, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Legal action against Monsanto gained traction as individuals who purportedly developed cancer after Roundup use or glyphosate exposure initiated lawsuits. These legal claims contended that Monsanto inadequately warned users about potential cancer risks associated with their products.

A pivotal moment occurred in August 2018 when Dewayne Johnson, a groundskeeper diagnosed with terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma, accused Monsanto of concealing Roundup's risks. The jury ruled in Johnson's favor, granting him significant damages. This landmark decision set the stage for thousands of additional lawsuits against Monsanto.

Subsequent to the Johnson case, numerous lawsuits were consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) to streamline legal proceedings. In June 2020, Bayer AG, Monsanto's parent company, reached a multibillion-dollar settlement agreement to resolve most pending Roundup lawsuits.

The Roundup litigation has sparked debates among scientists, regulatory bodies, and advocacy organizations. Various regulatory entities, including the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), have conducted comprehensive reviews of glyphosate's safety, yielding differing conclusions on its potential hazards.

While legal actions against Monsanto persist, the resolution of numerous lawsuits through settlements underscores the complexity of the issue.

The outcomes of this litigation, alongside ongoing scientific and regulatory deliberations concerning glyphosate, will profoundly influence public health policies, agricultural practices, and the agrochemical industry at large.